Step of Proof: nat_plus_inc
9,38
postcript
pdf
Inference at
*
I
of proof for Lemma
nat
plus
inc
:
latex
by (without_lemmas ``nat_plus_inc_nat`` ((Unfold `subtype` 0)
CollapseTHEN (
C
(Auto_aux (first_nat 1:n) ((first_nat 2:n),(first_nat 3:n)) (first_tok :t) inil_term)))
)
latex
C
.
Definitions
False
,
P
Q
,
A
,
A
B
,
t
T
,
x
:
A
.
B
(
x
)
,
,
S
T
,
,
Lemmas
nat
plus
wf
,
le
wf
origin